Separating application logs in Logback from Spark Logs in log4j
Separating application logs in Logback from Spark Logs in log4j
I have a Scala Maven project using that uses Spark, and I am trying implement logging using Logback. I am compiling my application to a jar, and deploying to an EC2 instance where the Spark distribution is installed.
My pom.xml includes dependencies for Spark and Logback as follows:
<dependency>
<groupId>ch.qos.logback</groupId>
<artifactId>logback-classic</artifactId>
<version>1.1.7</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>log4j-over-slf4j</artifactId>
<version>1.7.7</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.spark</groupId>
<artifactId>spark-core_${scala.binary.version}</artifactId>
<version>${spark.version}</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-log4j12</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>log4j</groupId>
<artifactId>log4j</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
When submit my Spark application, I print out the slf4j binding on the command line. If I execute the jars code using java, the binding is to Logback. If I use Spark (i.e. spark-submit), however, the binding is to log4j.
val logger: Logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass)
val sc: SparkContext = new SparkContext()
val rdd = sc.textFile("myFile.txt")
val slb: StaticLoggerBinder = StaticLoggerBinder.getSingleton
System.out.println("Logger Instance: " + slb.getLoggerFactory)
System.out.println("Logger Class Type: " + slb.getLoggerFactoryClassStr)
yields
Logger Instance: org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerFactory@a64e035
Logger Class Type: org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerFactory
I understand that both log4j-1.2.17.jar
and slf4j-log4j12-1.7.16.jar
are in /usr/local/spark/jars, and that Spark is most likely referencing these jars despite the exclusion in my pom.xml, because if I delete them I am given a ClassNotFoundException at runtime of spark-submit.
log4j-1.2.17.jar
slf4j-log4j12-1.7.16.jar
My question is: Is there a way to implement native logging in my application using Logback while preserving Spark's internal logging capabilities. Ideally, I'd like to write my Logback application logs to a file and allow Spark logs to still be shown at STDOUT.
4 Answers
4
I had the same problem: I was trying to use a logback config file. I tried many permutation, but I did not get it to work.
I was accessing logback through grizzled-slf4j using this SBT dependency:
"org.clapper" %% "grizzled-slf4j" % "1.3.0",
Once I added the log4j config file:
src/main/resources/log4j.properties/log4j.properties files.
my logging worked fine.
I wasted many hours looking. But I would like to know myself.
– Sami Badawi
Feb 9 '17 at 22:04
I had encountered a very similar problem.
Our build was similar to yours (but we used sbt
) and is described in detail here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/45479379/1549135
sbt
Running this solution locally works fine, but then spark-submit
would ignore all the exclusions and new logging framework (logback
) because spark's classpath has priority over the deployed jar. And since it contains log4j 1.2.xx
it would simply load it and ignore our setup.
spark-submit
logback
log4j 1.2.xx
Solution
I have used several sources. But quoting Spark 1.6.1 docs (applies to Spark latest / 2.2.0 as well):
spark.driver.extraClassPath
Extra classpath entries to prepend to the classpath of the driver.
Note: In client mode, this config must not be set through the SparkConf directly in your application, because the driver JVM has already started at that point. Instead, please set this through the --driver-class-path command line option or in your default properties file.
spark.executor.extraClassPath
Extra classpath entries to prepend to the classpath of executors. This exists primarily for backwards-compatibility with older versions of Spark. Users typically should not need to set this option.
What is not written here, though is that extraClassPath
takes precedence before default Spark's classpath!
extraClassPath
So now the solution should be quite obvious.
- log4j-over-slf4j-1.7.25.jar
- logback-classic-1.2.3.jar
- logback-core-1.2.3.jar
spark-submit
libs="/absolute/path/to/libs/*"
spark-submit
...
--master yarn
--conf "spark.driver.extraClassPath=$libs"
--conf "spark.executor.extraClassPath=$libs"
...
/my/application/application-fat.jar
param1 param2
I am just not yet sure if you can put those jars on HDFS. We have them locally next to the application jar.
userClassPathFirst
Strangely enough, using Spark 1.6.1
I have also found this option in docs:
Spark 1.6.1
spark.driver.userClassPathFirst, spark.executor.userClassPathFirst
(Experimental) Whether to give user-added jars precedence over Spark's own jars when loading classes in the the driver. This feature can be used to mitigate conflicts between Spark's dependencies and user dependencies. It is currently an experimental feature. This is used in cluster mode only.
But simply setting:
--conf "spark.driver.userClassPathFirst=true"
--conf "spark.executor.userClassPathFirst=true"
Did not work for me. So I am gladly using extraClassPath
!
extraClassPath
Cheers!
logback.xml
If you face any problems loading logback.xml
to Spark, my question here might help you out:
Pass system property to spark-submit and read file from classpath or custom path
logback.xml
After much struggle I've found another solution: library shading. After I've shaded org.slf4j
, my application logs are separated from spark logs. Furthermore, logback.xml
in my application jar is honored.
org.slf4j
logback.xml
Here you can find information on library shading in sbt, in this case it comes down to putting:
assemblyShadeRules in assembly += ShadeRule.rename(s"org.slf4j.**" -> "your_favourite_prefix.@0").inAll
in your build.sbt
settings.
build.sbt
Side note: If you are not sure whether shading actually happened, open your jar in some archive browser and check whether directory structure reflects shaded one, in this case your jar should contain path /your_favourite_prefix/org/slf4j
, but not /org/slf4j
/your_favourite_prefix/org/slf4j
/org/slf4j
My intention was to use the framework of my choice for both: application and spark and my solution allows it. But yes if you want separate configs shading is fine
– Atais
Apr 27 at 6:54
I packed logback and log4j-to-slf4j along with my other dependencies and src/main/resources/logback.xml in a fat jar.
When I run spark-submit with
--conf "spark.driver.userClassPathFirst=true"
--conf "spark.executor.userClassPathFirst=true"
all logging is handled by logback.
By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.
Ended up using the same approach, unfortunately this is still using log4j as the underlying framework though. Still wondering if anyone was able to configure Logback.
– sbrannon
Feb 9 '17 at 21:57